I didn't post on the cyberterrorism thread because by the time I got there all my points had already been made. Several times. B-> But congratulations to those who will be quoted in Jane's.
It will be interesting to see if this starts a trend. But on the other hand, they used to say "Go not to the USENET for counsel, for they will say both no, and yes, and `That's already answered in the FAQ, and..." (Or something like that.) And that was pre-AOL, pre-spam, pre-The-September-That-Never-Ended.
But, on the gripping hand (wow, Tolkein and Niven/Pournelle refs in the same post!),/.'s moderation would seem to help the best, most informative posts bubble to the top in such a discussion.
It would be interesting to set up a consulting organization along these lines. Or maybe even use the existing/. infrastructure.
Well done, Jane's - will we see more of the same? (Score:1)
I didn't post on the cyberterrorism thread because by the time I got there all my points had already been made. Several times. B-> But congratulations to those who will be quoted in Jane's.
It will be interesting to see if this starts a trend. But on the other hand, they used to say "Go not to the USENET for counsel, for they will say both no, and yes, and `That's already answered in the FAQ, and..." (Or something like that.) And that was pre-AOL, pre-spam, pre-The-September-That-Never-Ended.
But, on the gripping hand (wow, Tolkein and Niven/Pournelle refs in the same post!), /.'s moderation would seem to help the best, most informative posts bubble to the top in such a discussion.
It would be interesting to set up a consulting organization along these lines. Or maybe even use the existing /. infrastructure.