Wow! This is wonderful, wonderful news. I was already amazed at Jane's request of Slashdot users to contribute their opinions on the original article, but this?
Clearly, Jane is top of their field for a good reason. They know how to innovate and pick up their source from new, yet very pertinent origins.
I sincerely hope that other companies follow this trend. Slashdot is a watering hole for many experts on various subjects, and that, and not prestige or visibility is what determines the validity of an opinion!
How many can claim to pay for good information, even if it comes from someone posting as "Anonymous Coward" on a public bulletin board?
I applaud this, and hope we see more of it in the future.
"There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts."
Wow! (Score:1)
Clearly, Jane is top of their field for a good reason. They know how to innovate and pick up their source from new, yet very pertinent origins.
I sincerely hope that other companies follow this trend. Slashdot is a watering hole for many experts on various subjects, and that, and not prestige or visibility is what determines the validity of an opinion!
How many can claim to pay for good information, even if it comes from someone posting as "Anonymous Coward" on a public bulletin board?
I applaud this, and hope we see more of it in the future.
"There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts."