And here I thought that editorials were supposed to express one specific point of view.
That disclaimer is pure shit.
So, you know for a fact that Mr. Weightman doesn't personally believe what he's saying in this essay, and is really just acting as a mouthpiece for his clients? Is there some rule that says lawyers aren't supposed to take cases in which they agree with their clients? Is it somehow intellectually dishonest?
Many other posters have raised some serious points against mandated open access to the "last mile". We wouldn't be reading these responses and engaging in this discussion right now if Mr. Weightman hadn't been given access to this forum to clearly state his side of the issue.
Re:A Ridiculous Post (Score:3)
That disclaimer is pure shit.
So, you know for a fact that Mr. Weightman doesn't personally believe what he's saying in this essay, and is really just acting as a mouthpiece for his clients? Is there some rule that says lawyers aren't supposed to take cases in which they agree with their clients? Is it somehow intellectually dishonest?
Many other posters have raised some serious points against mandated open access to the "last mile". We wouldn't be reading these responses and engaging in this discussion right now if Mr. Weightman hadn't been given access to this forum to clearly state his side of the issue.