Another idiot talking outside his expertise. He has no clue about evolution, thinks darwin wrote everything about it, and can not understand new data.
Lets me clue you in: If we found out, right now, Darwin made the whole thing up, it wouldn't matter because of the amount of other data we have collected, the number of accurate predictions that have been done, and a completely lack of understanding of the second law of thermodynamics.
"Todayâ(TM)s strict evolutionists are unhappy about Darwinâ(TM)s views, for even today he would be unable to provide a satisfactory explanation"
Pretty much everything he says about evolution is wrong, and this is utterly wrong, particularly with regard to the "transition fossils" question it seems to be referring to. There are plenty of transition fossils. It's simply not an issue any more.
Darwinian theory predicted that there would be transition fossils. In Darwin's day transition fossils had not been found. Today they have, in abundance. To claim otherwise is to divorce yourself from simple, ordinary truth.
Furthermore, the invoke God as the "simplest explanation" for the diversity of life is to claim that somehow God, who is by definition incomprehensible according to Scripture, is somehow "simpler" than a process that necessarily follows from the chemistry of carbon compounds and the laws of probability as we currently understand them: http://www.amazon.com/Darwins-... [amazon.com]
What an ego mania. (Score:1, Flamebait)
Another idiot talking outside his expertise.
He has no clue about evolution, thinks darwin wrote everything about it, and can not understand new data.
Lets me clue you in:
If we found out, right now, Darwin made the whole thing up, it wouldn't matter because of the amount of other data we have collected, the number of accurate predictions that have been done, and a completely lack of understanding of the second law of thermodynamics.
This guy doesn't belong in any science magazine.
"But I am unaware of how natu
Re:What an ego mania. (Score:2)
"Todayâ(TM)s strict evolutionists are unhappy about Darwinâ(TM)s views, for even today he would be unable to provide a satisfactory explanation"
Pretty much everything he says about evolution is wrong, and this is utterly wrong, particularly with regard to the "transition fossils" question it seems to be referring to. There are plenty of transition fossils. It's simply not an issue any more.
Darwinian theory predicted that there would be transition fossils. In Darwin's day transition fossils had not been found. Today they have, in abundance. To claim otherwise is to divorce yourself from simple, ordinary truth.
Furthermore, the invoke God as the "simplest explanation" for the diversity of life is to claim that somehow God, who is by definition incomprehensible according to Scripture, is somehow "simpler" than a process that necessarily follows from the chemistry of carbon compounds and the laws of probability as we currently understand them: http://www.amazon.com/Darwins-... [amazon.com]