It's hard to say. To be honest, to me they sound exactly like the non-answers I'd expect any executive officer to give. The fact they don't mention PRISM at all in reference to recent US government capability is definitely interesting, given that they used to openly state that TOR is weak against such widespread surveillance.
Would you explain what other answers you would have expected to be given to those lame, sometimes ridiculous "questions", some of them starting from blatantly false premises (e.g., the one who says that TrueCrypt is compromised) ?
Documents leaked by Snowden prove that the NSA itself admits to not being able to break Tor. Is it enough or you are one of the guys who think that Snowden himself is a giant PR conspiracy by the NSA itself to promote compromised software?
Each honest calling, each walk of life, has its own elite, its own aristocracy
based on excellence of performance. -- James Bryant Conant
It's true then, what I've been told some time ago. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:It's true then, what I've been told some time a (Score:5, Insightful)
It's hard to say. To be honest, to me they sound exactly like the non-answers I'd expect any executive officer to give. The fact they don't mention PRISM at all in reference to recent US government capability is definitely interesting, given that they used to openly state that TOR is weak against such widespread surveillance.
Re: (Score:0)
Would you explain what other answers you would have expected to be given to those lame, sometimes ridiculous "questions", some of them starting from blatantly false premises (e.g., the one who says that TrueCrypt is compromised) ?
Documents leaked by Snowden prove that the NSA itself admits to not being able to break Tor. Is it enough or you are one of the guys who think that Snowden himself is a giant PR conspiracy by the NSA itself to promote compromised software?