Would this article show up when talking about:
"Male-Run companies often do better than Female-run ones" ?
Would it? On Slashdot the news for SJWs - apparently.
Btw such article would be correct (this statement is correct).
Same goes for...
Streight-run companies often do better than homosexual-run ones.
Homosexuals-run companies often do better than streight-run ones.
White-run companies often do better then Blakcs-run ones.
Blacks-run companies often do better then normale ones.
etc.
Does anyone thing
Do you have any evidence that an article about male run companies doing better wouldn't be posted? Sounds like you just want to be the victim.
Anyway, the likely reason for any statistical advantage for female run companies is simply that they are better at hiring women, and thus have access to a larger pool of candidates. A larger pool means a higher average standard, and on top of that they probably have better conditions than average and are better able retain skilled staff.
Do you have any evidence that an article about male run companies doing better wouldn't be posted?
This article could have been posted with the headline Male-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male-Run Ones, with the exact same study, using the exact same data. Can't you see the slant in the article? Or an agenda in the summary?
Sexist article (Score:5, Insightful)
"Male-Run companies often do better than Female-run ones" ?
Would it? On Slashdot the news for SJWs - apparently.
Btw such article would be correct (this statement is correct).
Same goes for...
Streight-run companies often do better than homosexual-run ones.
Homosexuals-run companies often do better than streight-run ones.
White-run companies often do better then Blakcs-run ones.
Blacks-run companies often do better then normale ones.
etc.
Does anyone thing
Re:Sexist article (Score:1, Insightful)
Do you have any evidence that an article about male run companies doing better wouldn't be posted? Sounds like you just want to be the victim.
Anyway, the likely reason for any statistical advantage for female run companies is simply that they are better at hiring women, and thus have access to a larger pool of candidates. A larger pool means a higher average standard, and on top of that they probably have better conditions than average and are better able retain skilled staff.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Do you have any evidence that an article about male run companies doing better wouldn't be posted?
This article could have been posted with the headline Male-Run Companies Often do Better Than Male-Run Ones, with the exact same study, using the exact same data. Can't you see the slant in the article? Or an agenda in the summary?