Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science

Interviews: Ask James Randi About Investigating the Truth 386

Better known by his stage name "The Amazing Randi", James Randi has made it his quest to "debunk psychic nonsense, disprove paranormal fakers, and squash claims of pseudoscience in order to bring the truth to the forefront." Randi worked as a popular magician most of his life and earned international fame in 1972 when he accused the famous psychic Uri Geller of being a fraud and challenged him to prove otherwise. In 1996 Randi founded The James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) a non-profit organization whose mission includes "educating the public and the media on the dangers of accepting unproven claims, and to support research into paranormal claims in controlled scientific experimental conditions." He began offering $1000 in 1964 to anyone who could demonstrate proof of the paranormal. That amount has grown over the years, and the foundation's prize for such proof is now $1M. Around 1000 people have tried to claim the prize so far without success. Randi has agreed to take a break from busting ghostbusters and giving psychic healers a taste of their own medicine in order to answer your questions. As usual, you're invited to ask as many questions as you'd like, but please divide them, one question per post.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Interviews: Ask James Randi About Investigating the Truth

Comments Filter:
  • query (Score:5, Interesting)

    by LokiSteve ( 557281 ) <primate_s@nospam.hotmail.com> on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:34PM (#42738555)
    What's the most dangerous lie perpetuated by the people you bust?
  • Best fraud? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TrumpetPower! ( 190615 ) <ben@trumpetpower.com> on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:36PM (#42738573) Homepage

    Mr. Amazing,

    Of the various people who've tried for the prize, which one do you think would have made the best entertainer / carnie / whatever had he or she not been so serious about the reality of the trick?

    Cheers,

    b&

  • obsession (Score:5, Interesting)

    by j00r0m4nc3r ( 959816 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:38PM (#42738593)
    What do you think is the root cause of humans' obsession with believing in supernatural powers, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary?
  • by TrumpetPower! ( 190615 ) <ben@trumpetpower.com> on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:39PM (#42738607) Homepage

    Most people know you for your work laying bare the schemes of fraudsters, and not enough people realize that you really are as good as your stage name. What's the best show you've ever performed that's been recorded and how can we see it?

    Cheers,

    b&

  • by Bananatree3 ( 872975 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:40PM (#42738625)
    Through your years of research on faith healing, homeopathy and other "magical" cures...have you found some of them more "effective" than others due to the Placebo Effect? Many people have superstitions, charms and other things they personally believe bring them good luck...and I wonder how much of this magical healing and luck bringing is real due to the Placebo Effect. Of course it is not "magic", but the power of a Placebo is still statistically valid in certain cases it seems.
  • Legacy (Score:4, Interesting)

    by abies ( 607076 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:47PM (#42738703)

    While we all hope you will live as long as possible and continue your work, do you think that somebody will pick up your legacy and continue to debunk the fraudsters when you are not longer able to? Do you have trusted people to whom you are willing to hand over the responsibility, both financially and skill-wise?

  • repercussions? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by poetmatt ( 793785 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @12:51PM (#42738737) Journal

    Have you ever had significant repercussions from debunking what is essentially garbage? Have people ever actually threatened you for supposedly crushing any livelihoods, which were then based on fraud?

  • by turp182 ( 1020263 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @01:12PM (#42739025) Journal

    That's it.

  • by CanHasDIY ( 1672858 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @01:22PM (#42739179) Homepage Journal
    Rule #4 of the Applicant Rules for your prize reads:

    In all cases, the Applicant will be required to perform a Preliminary Test in a location where a properly authorized representative of the JREF can attend. This Preliminary Test is intended to determine if the Applicant is likely to perform as promised during the Formal Test, using the agreed-upon protocol. To date, no applicant has passed the Preliminary Test, and therefore no Formal Test has yet been conducted. At any time prior to the Formal Test, the JREF reserves the right to re-negotiate the protocol if issues are discovered that would prevent a fair and unbiased test. After an agreement is reached on the protocol, no part of the testing procedure may be changed in any way without an amended agreement, signed by all parties concerned.

    Couldn't this be construed as an attempt to prevent any potentially legitimate applicants from being considered for the prize?

    Is there any way you can prove that your organization is not falsely debunking claims during the "Preliminary Tests," in order to prevent the prize from being claimed?

  • $1M prize (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Velex ( 120469 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @01:25PM (#42739237) Journal
    What's the closest you've come to giving out the $1M prize?
  • Re:Your show! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by vlm ( 69642 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @01:27PM (#42739267)

    Ultra short version: In your experience, whats the approximate crooks to nuts ratio? 50/50 or 10/90 or 90/10 ...

  • by irenaeous ( 898337 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @02:01PM (#42739729) Journal

    I ask this because I used to regard myself as a Christian skeptic. While I support what you do and much of the work of the skeptical movement, I now no longer make that claim because current skepticism seems joined at the hip with atheism. I am sure you know, one of the early leaders of the skeptic movement, Martin Gardner, was a theist and a self professed liberal Christian. Are people like Martin Gardner welcome in the movement today?

    And, as a Christian I thank you for exposing the televangelist faith healing frauds.

  • by iris-n ( 1276146 ) on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @02:02PM (#42739747)

    Have you ever succeeded in changing someone's beliefs in pseudoscience? Do you think that it is possible to do so in a large scale, to move humanity towards a more rational way of thinking?

    Sorry for the down tone, but I have plenty of experience in failing to convince people of the falsehood in astrology, homeopathy, acupunture, etc., and very little in succeeding.

  • Your Axioms... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by under_score ( 65824 ) <mishkin@be[ ]ig.com ['rte' in gap]> on Wednesday January 30, 2013 @03:28PM (#42740831) Homepage

    I was wondering what axioms you hold to be true? Any rational system has a set of axioms that are the unprovable foundation of that rational system. What do you believe on faith?

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.

Working...