Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education Open Source Programming

Interviews: Ask Senior Director Matt Keller About the Global Learning XPRIZE 31

The former Vice President of One Laptop per Child (OLPC) Matt Keller is currently the Senior Director of the $15 million Global Learning XPRIZE. The competition challenges teams from around the world to develop open source software solutions that will allow children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic within a 18 month competition period. After 18 months a panel of judges will evaluate the projects and announce semi-finalists. Semi-finalists will have a month to tweak their projects and/or reconfigure their teams before the judges elect the top five finalist to proceed. Each of the five teams selected will receive $1 million to field test their ideas with the eventual winners receiving the Grand Prize of $10 million. The Global Learning XPRIZE is recruiting teams now through April 30, 2015. Matt has agreed to answer any questions you might have about the competition and the future of education in general. As usual, ask as many as you'd like, but please, one per post.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Interviews: Ask Senior Director Matt Keller About the Global Learning XPRIZE

Comments Filter:
  • Tech is changing fast, and almost free tablets are coming. It can be argued that efforts to promote one solution eg. the iPad or this software actually detract from the spontaneous emergence of new ideas via the grassroots. See what happened with the OLPC ...

    • by Anonymous Coward

      If the goal is to come up with a free software solution for people who can't afford an education why charge $500 to register? Wouldn't this preclude people in these areas from competing? It seems to me that these people might have the best ideas of what might work since they live there.

  • by itzly ( 3699663 ) on Wednesday February 25, 2015 @02:04PM (#49129889)

    Why can't the kids learn basic reading, writing and arithmetic from regular teachers ?

    • by m00sh ( 2538182 )

      Why can't the kids learn basic reading, writing and arithmetic from regular teachers ?

      As it says in the youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dnn7NFQPbQ#t=52), the traditional model of education is not sustainable or scalable for those living in developing countries.

      • by itzly ( 3699663 )

        the traditional model of education is not sustainable or scalable for those living in developing countries.

        That's just an unfounded assertion. One teacher can easily educate 40 students, whether they are living in developing countries or not. After 10 years or so, these students can become teachers. For basic reading/writing/math you can do it even quicker. Sounds perfectly sustainable and scalable to me.

  • by nbauman ( 624611 ) on Wednesday February 25, 2015 @02:42PM (#49130317) Homepage Journal

    Has this ever worked before? Has anyone ever shown that it's possible for children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic? And have they published their results in peer-reviewed journals?

    I thought that most of the research found that computers weren't too useful in teaching basic reading, writing and arithmetic, even when students had assistance.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10... [nytimes.com]
    Inflating the Software Report Card
    By TRIP GABRIEL and MATT RICHTEL
    October 8, 2011
    (United States Department of Education's What Works Clearinghouse review of 10 major software products for teaching algebra and elementary and middle school math and reading found that 9 “did not have statistically significant effects on test scores.”)

    • by m00sh ( 2538182 )

      Has this ever worked before? Has anyone ever shown that it's possible for children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic? And have they published their results in peer-reviewed journals?

      I thought that most of the research found that computers weren't too useful in teaching basic reading, writing and arithmetic, even when students had assistance.

      http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10... [nytimes.com] Inflating the Software Report Card By TRIP GABRIEL and MATT RICHTEL October 8, 2011 (United States Department of Education's What Works Clearinghouse review of 10 major software products for teaching algebra and elementary and middle school math and reading found that 9 “did not have statistically significant effects on test scores.”)

      Excellent question.

      What is the major problem that limits children from learning from apps now? Most children in the US are glued to the iPad and I'm sure people have tried to create learning apps.

      Is it lacking in apps and games, or lacking in content? Or, is it lacking in algorithms or just a charismatic personality for the students to learn from?

      Also, how are app/content developers going to test their stuff against children in the developing world or children in general? Are there schools or organiza

  • ...maybe you just suck.

    The competition challenges teams from around the world to develop open source software solutions that will allow children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic.

    It has been the geek's wet dream for at least the past ten years to take the teacher out of the grade school classroom --- which damn little evidence to show that he has was ever on the right track.

    • ...maybe you just suck.

      The competition challenges teams from around the world to develop open source software solutions that will allow children in developing countries to teach themselves basic reading, writing and arithmetic.

      It has been the geek's wet dream for at least the past ten years to take the teacher out of the grade school classroom --- which damn little evidence to show that he has was ever on the right track.

      It's a standard trope on slashdot (and other geek sites) that teachers just discourage all the brilliant students from achieving their full awesomeness.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 25, 2015 @05:57PM (#49132455)

    There is a cycle with technology in education.

    Next technologies or approaches are develop. We are promised they will revolutionize education. The hype builds. Everyone shells out cash. Research kicks in. Research shows only small gains were made in small populations. Look the next great thing is here to save education.

    This cycle has been going at least since the invention of the radio and likely before. What have you seen as Senior Director that gives you hope that we will eventually break free from this cycle and actually see significant gains in education?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Lots of these developing countries aren't known for being very stable or have issues with educating portions of their population (girls for example). Do you work directly with the governments in these developing areas? Do they seem enthusiastic to your goal?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Who is on the judging panel? Is it just educators or do you have people with other areas of expertise like economists, programmers, or people with specific knowledge of these developing areas?

Do molecular biologists wear designer genes?

Working...